Why So Much Driving?

There’s a pretty good New York Times story this morning on the conflicting nature of federal policies for congestion reduction. The piece notes that DOT is allocating $850 million toward urban traffic reduction, while the federal government simultaneously gives commuters a parking tax break worth about $150 million annually. Cross-purposes, people! But the Times story would be markedly better if it included another number or two for people to chew on. For example, the feds spend about $35 billion every year on highways. If I had to speculate about which factors contributed most to car commuting, I’d probably lean toward that figure as a tad more important than the parking subsidy. And obviously, that’s far from the only large chunk of highway money. Throw in state and local spending on pavement, along with all the money dedicated to traffic enforcement, and whatever goes toward ensuring a steady supply of gasoline, and the peculiar pattern of American urban development stops looking so mysterious.

Comments

  1. monkeyrotica says:

    I dunno. $35 billion seems like a pretty good deal compared to the nearly $3 billion for a lousy 20 miles of Metro rail from Falls Church to Dulles. But hey, if you’re dumb enough to live in Dulles…

  2. ryan says:

    C’mon, monkey. That $3 billion in rail will carry many more people than $3 billion in pavement could. By facilitating density, it will also allow the rail corridor to accommodate billions more in development than a comparable highway would. And that $3 billion isn’t a per year amount. Rail to Dulles will cost about $5 billion over the course of 8 years. Compare that to $280 billion in federal highway funds, at a minimum, over 8 years. Some deal.

  3. monkeyrotica says:

    You’re missing my point. Instead of throwing limited resources at what is essentially a sprawl umbilical cord, Metro should be putting that money expanding/maintaining service at the core.

    Adding road capacity just encourages sprawl. That goes double for ex-urb mass transit, except with a bigger pricetag. And with real estate imploding in Dulles, Sterling, and beyond, that money would be better spent on the inner suburbs, not on some chrome-plated turd to Dulles.

  4. ryan says:

    I would disagree with you that ex-urban mass transit encourages more sprawl than comparable roads, if that’s what you’re saying. The problem with sprawl isn’t so much that it’s a long way from the core, but that it’s low density. It’s not like we’re putting the Fairfax genie back in a bottle, so we’d be better off building transit infrastructure there that encourages density rather than more roads.

    But to the extent that building the Silver Line reduces spending on maintenance and expansion in the core, I agree with you 100%. Only, I’m not sure that’s true. I doubt, in other words, that Virginia would be ponying up money for core improvements if there were no line to Dulles. Actually, the Silver Line might hasten expansion in the core by bogging the motherfucker down.

    I just think that if the federal government shifted some road funds to mass transit, we wouldn’t have to gnash our teeth so much about whether WMATA should invest in keeping Metro functional or work on increasing coverage.

  5. monkeyrotica says:

    If you’re looking at home sales, the Fairfax genie’s gone back into his bottle of his own accord. Downtown, Arlington, and Montgomery Counties are driving growth; THAT’s where Metro cash should be spent. It’s the Loudons and Prince Williams where residential market collapse is imminent, yet we continue to throw Metro money there, at people who are more more than happy sitting in cars for 2-3 hours a day.

    The more I look at this, the more I see light rail/streetcar “spurs” as the most cost-effective tool to connect stations and expand service. That’s something the car crowd might buy into: riding the streetcar from whereever to Tysons Corner or Springfield Mall or Pentagon City Mall. Crowbarring new stations takes too long and costs too much. With the major growth in commuting being suburb-to-suburb, Metro should be working on expanding the streecar test beds, not shoving Silver Lines down peoples throats. Dulles Toll Road was MADE to have a streetcar run down the middle to Tysons: fixed track so no worries about getting on the wrong bus, and the Eritrean mafia cab lobby would finally get some competition.

  6. ryan says:

    Too much to address in one comment. You’ve given me a reason to write a follow-up post, monkey, time permitting.

  7. ryan says:

    You know what, monkey? I may write about this for DCist on Sunday. Stay tuned.